To conceptualize the awards process framework (develop evaluation criteria, Jury selection, results tabulation), to review compliance to the designed process, identify critical risks, and establish adequate risk mitigation parameters
Design the awards process to identify and ensure mitigation of risks (via gap analysis)
Identify key processes, and create audit trail for adherence to process and independent validation
Co-define and review the guidelines, eligibility criteria and evaluation parameters
Identify the target audience, connecting with key stakeholders, and encourage participation (call for entries)
Cyber security review and input/ output (functionality) testing of application site (as applicable), voting systems, links, and microsites
Perform due diligence on the shortlisted participants based on the agreed upon terms for participation
Initial screening of entries to ensure completeness, timeliness, and adequate submission of certified data (as applicable)
Suggestions on jury composition from diverse backgrounds and ensuring no conflict-of-interest exist within participants
Independent maker-checker control to ensure valid tabulation of the entries
Perform Live analysis of control gaps in the existing processes
Virtual presence to ensure independence
Review the compliance with the defined processes during the awards ceremony
Comprehensive risk and control assessment for the awards
01Final tabulation of the official result list according to each category
Setting up of tie-breaker process to help with tie-case scenarios
03